Date: 2/8/2008 8:00 pm
Rating: 0
It just occurred to me that this group has never done a talk on general software testing. Would anyone be interested in that topic? I'm thinking subtopics like Test::More, Test::Class, Test::WWWW::Mechanize, integration with Build.PL and Makefile.PL, cpantesters, code coverage via Devel::Cover, etc.
I'm a huge fan of Test::Class and Devel::Cover myself.
Date: 2/15/2008 12:13 pm
Rating: 0
-Robert-
jt wrote:
I've put down your testing talk on the calendar. I think it's a great idea. We've just started using Test::Class in WebGUI, so I'd love to hear more about it.
Madison Area Perl Mongers - MadMongers
http://www.madmongers.org
Date: 2/15/2008 12:13 pm
Rating: 0
JT
chrisdolan wrote:
It just occurred to me that this group has never done a talk on general software testing. Would anyone be interested in that topic? I'm thinking subtopics like Test::More, Test::Class, Test::WWWW::Mechanize, integration with Build.PL and Makefile.PL, cpantesters, code coverage via Devel::Cover, etc.
I'm a huge fan of Test::Class and Devel::Cover myself.
Date: 2/15/2008 12:13 pm
Rating: 0
chrisdolan wrote:
It just occurred to me that this group has never done a talk on general software testing. Would anyone be interested in that topic? I'm thinking subtopics like Test::More, Test::Class, Test::WWWW::Mechanize, integration with Build.PL and Makefile.PL, cpantesters, code coverage via Devel::Cover, etc.
I'm a huge fan of Test::Class and Devel::Cover myself.
Madison Area Perl Mongers - MadMongers
http://www.madmongers.org
--
Don Smith
don.c.smith@gmail.com
www.theraccoonbear.com
www.MadHC.com
Date: 2/15/2008 8:40 pm
Rating: 0
month. I would love to hear more about all the Testing modules and
which ones are preferred.
-Rachna
On 2/15/08, doug@commctrl.com wrote:
>
>
> preaction wrote:
> It would be a good topic.
>
> I'm of the opinion that Test::Deep is the greatest thing since
> Test::Builder.
>
> It seems that this topic could be too big for a single session though.
>
>
>
> View Online
>
>
> Madison Area Perl Mongers - MadMongers
> http://www.madmongers.org
>
>
Date: 2/15/2008 9:54 pm
Rating: 0
wrote:
> preaction wrote:
>
> It would be a good topic.
>
> I'm of the opinion that Test::Deep is the greatest thing since
> Test::Builder.
>
> It seems that this topic could be too big for a single session though.
Agreed. My current thought is that I'm going to do the first half on
testing in general and the second half on Test::More and Test::Class
specifically. So, perhaps the first half will be light on Perl and
the second half will be heavy. Just a thought...
If anyone wants to splice a 5-15 minute mini-talk into mine (either
infix or suffix), that would be fine with me.
Chris
Date: 2/15/2008 12:13 pm
Rating: 0
chrisdolan wrote:
It just occurred to me that this group has never done a talk on general software testing. Would anyone be interested in that topic? I'm thinking subtopics like Test::More, Test::Class, Test::WWWW::Mechanize, integration with Build.PL and Makefile.PL, cpantesters, code coverage via Devel::Cover, etc.
I'm a huge fan of Test::Class and Devel::Cover myself.
Testing sounds great, I've never understood quite how all the details work, though I've been listening in on the Perl6 process and 'made smoke' for parrot on a few different platforms.
> Andy, if we're to do an informal February event, I would be up for 2/21,
2/21 may well be the date, though there's a chance I'll not be able to make it now. I had a little knee event over the weekend and tore a piece of my meniscus. I'm having surgery (should be quick) on Tuesday, so I may be walking by then (I hope so) but we'll have to see.
a